What I've been trying to do recently is to try to map social services departments who encouraged false SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse) allegations in the early 1990's with those that allow and encourage false Witchcraft Syndrome allegations from the mid-1990's to the present day.
The evidence, though not yet compelling, does suggest that the same departments and social workers simply switched from one methodology to another as SRA lost it's credibility and went "out of fashion."
MSBP in itself isn't quite so fashionable; to make a false allegation the social worker really needs the willing and enthusiastic participation of the likes of a paediatrician or other health care worker, and they aren't always game for making such an allegation. In the case of Leeds City Council vs Mrs YX & Mr ZX (
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2008/802.html the false allegations of child abuse (no MSBP allegation, but employed RAD as the false allegation mechanism) came unstuck due to the intervention of Dr Sheila Clark, a consultant dermatologist, who was seemingly unwillingly to "follow the line."
In response to the vulnerability of false MSBP allegations requiring the willing and active participation of others, we have "emotional abuse" an unrecognised and undefined term that gives the social workers more scope for placing a false allegation without being dependent on health workers who can't always be trusted to comply. Emotional abuse allows for the use of a specific sub-set of experts to be employed who can always be guranteed to submit a report that favours forced adoption, and as a "crank" science concept - emotional abuse can comprise anything and everything, allowing even minor incidents to be overblown and for almost limitless opportunities for "gilding the lily."