Secrets wrote:A company operates as its own legal identity.
A MK can be a friend, without any legal obligation.
Or a shareholder in JFF, also gets limited liability - if the paedophile rings decide to sue JFF, (which lets face it paedophiles are obsessive nutters...), the maximum liability would be £1.
MK and JFF are two distinct and mutually exclusive aspects. So JFF and being a MK are not linked.
But if JFF takes on Jersey, then IMHO, they must operate as a limited company.
I've only had limited dealings with paedophiles via youtube. One paedophile battled 3 members of MFJ from around 7 pm to 6 am the next morning - over a video.
Taunting obsessively that paedophilia was not illegal.
paedophiles are maniacs. totally unhinged.
Obsessive about their catalogues.
Use "airy fairy" visionary language. Think they're hiding behind "linguistics" and you don't know what they really mean.
This was dearest Nigella, Nigel the Paedophile. Convicted for 15,000 child porn images... so he's always down the shed, "filing"....for want of a better word.
I'd definitely, from my limited exposure (no pun intended...) to paedophiles would want every single blockage, and legal identity put between them and me.
They're exasperating to fight, even when it's many against one.
Totally unhinged.
They would sue the backside off you, given the chance.
Nigel is also a doctor, he's very bright. Takes on cases for other paedophiles, so he might well be one that JFF will have to come across in the future.
They're so bad, that it stuns you. They honestly believe that they have the right "Sexual attraction to minors" and that there's nothing wrong with it. If you weren't careful, they could almost convince you black was white.
That's why I'd say, even after 24 hours in the ring, get the nukes primed going up against paedophile rings. Trust me, they're warped...
Sounds like the typical social worker.
