Welcome
Information to be remembered when discussing your case: Click Here

Welcome to Justice For Families. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Part of the new childrens bill

Part of the new childrens bill

Postby escape on Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:32 pm

Independent visitors for children looked after by a local authority (1) After section 23ZA of the 1989 Act (which is inserted by section 15) insert—
“23ZB Independent visitors for children looked after by a local authority (1) A local authority looking after a child must appoint an independent person to be the child’s visitor if—
(a) the child falls within a description prescribed in regulations made by the appropriate national authority; or
(b) in any other case, it appears to them that it would be in the child’s interests to do so.
(2) A person appointed under this section must visit, befriend and advise the child.
(3) A person appointed under this section is entitled to recover from the appointing authority any reasonable expenses incurred by that person for the purposes of that person’s functions under this section.
(4) A person’s appointment as a visitor in pursuance of this section comes to an end if—
(a) the child ceases to be looked after by the local authority;
(b) the person resigns the appointment by giving notice in writing to the appointing authority; or
(c) the authority give him notice in writing that they have terminated it.
(5) The ending of such an appointment does not affect any duty under this section to make a further appointment.
(6) Where a local authority propose to appoint a visitor for a child under this section, the appointment shall not be made if—
(a) the child objects to it; and
(b) the authority are satisfied that the child has sufficient understanding to make an informed decision.
(7) Where a visitor has been appointed for a child under this section, the local authority shall terminate the appointment if—
(a) the child objects to its continuing; and
(b) the authority are satisfied that the child has sufficient understanding to make an informed decision.
(8) If the local authority give effect to a child’s objection under subsection (6) or (7) and the objection is to having anyone as the child’s visitor, the authority does not have to propose to appoint another person under subsection (1) until the objection is withdrawn.
(9) The appropriate national authority may make regulations as to the circumstances in which a person is to be regarded for the purposes of this section as independent of the appointing authority.”
(2) Omit paragraph 17 of Schedule 2 to the 1989 Act.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John can you explain this part of the new bill please as it appears that it is the hands of the local authority if a child is entitled to an independent visitor, the arguments i was reading during the debates were that it was going to be for every child in care and it had to be someone that has no conections with SS. what are the regulations they have quoted to show entitlement.

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2008/uk ... -pb4-l1g16
escape
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Surrey

Return to Children Act 1989

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests