Welcome
Information to be remembered when discussing your case: Click Here

Welcome to Justice For Families. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Latest family procedure rules

Any other campaigning including reports

Latest family procedure rules

Postby avenger on Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:25 am

http://www.justice.gov.uk/latest-updates/7550.htm

Family Procedure Rule Committee news: January – April 2009
05 June 2009


The Family Procedure Rule Committee has published details of its work between January and April 2009.

January to March 2009
The committee consulted on the draft Family Procedure Rules in November 2008. Responses were invited by 27 February 2009.

While the draft rules were out for consultation the committee met three times to consider proposals to amend the Family Proceedings Rules. The committee examined proposals to amend the rules relating to the process for (a) statutory rights of appeal from decisions of a magistrates’ court; and (b) internal appeals in a county court from a decision of a district judge to a judge.

The Family Proceedings Rule Committee made the Family Proceedings (Amendment) Rules 2009 [SI 2009 No.636 (L.5)] on 10 March. The rules were also able to accommodate appeals lying to a county court from decisions of a magistrates’ court in accordance with the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) (Family Proceedings) Order 2009. This statutory instrument (SI) also incorporated consequential amendments arising from the Childcare Act 2006 and the Children and Young Persons Act 2008.

The committee considered proposals to amend the rules in relation to the right of media representatives to attend family proceedings heard in private (subject to judicial discretion to exclude). The committee also developed a new Part XI of the Family Proceedings Rules dealing with the communication of information relating to proceedings relating to children.

April 2009
Following its consideration in February and March of proposals to amend the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 in relation to the right of media representatives to attend family proceedings heard in private (subject to judicial discretion to exclude) and in relation to communication of information regarding proceedings relating to children, the Family Proceedings Rule Committee made the Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No.2) Rules 2009 [SI 2009 No.857 (L.8)].

The committee held a two-day meeting in April to begin its consideration of responses to the consultation paper ‘Family Procedure Rules – an invitation to comment on the Draft Rules, Practice Directions and Forms’.

The committee recorded its gratitude to all those who responded for their carefully considered comments. The committee will continue its consideration of responses at its meetings in May and June.
Contact press office
Newsdesk: 020 3334 3536
(Mon - Fri: 07:00 to 20:00)

Related information
Press office
Family Procedure Rule Committee news: November-December 2008
Family Procedure Rule Committee
Family Procedure (Adoption) Rules
avenger
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:12 am

Postby avenger on Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:06 pm

The committee considered proposals to amend the rules in relation to the right of media representatives to attend family proceedings heard in private (subject to judicial discretion to exclude)



So if the judge doesn't allow media coverage then the poor family who is on the end of injustice has had it,I presume.
avenger
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:12 am

Postby Andrew on Tue Jun 16, 2009 3:11 pm

Exactly.

Pitty there is not a list of the judges who refuse and how often.
Andrew
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:35 pm
Location: finishing reading george orwell's 1984 to see where we are going

Postby Secrets on Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:50 pm

Andrew wrote:Exactly.

Pitty there is not a list of the judges who refuse and how often.


If we can find out who many applications have been made, and the numbers refused... Bet it would be embarrassing for them.
Secrets
 
Posts: 1747
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 9:15 pm
Location: Under the bed, hiding from our Police State.


Return to Other campaigning

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests