Justice For Families

May I ask you;
how many of you got an order for NO CONTACT: section44(6)(a) Children Act 1989 )

Permission to seek a no contact order for the mother & child .

Then deleted out is a reference to seek a medical or psychiatric examination or other assessment of the child[ren] section 44 (6)(b) Children Act1989 )

to be accompanied by a registered medical practitioner,registered nurse or registered health visitor.(section 45 (12) children Act 1989)
an exclusion requirement (section 44 A (1) Children Act 1989)

Please keep all of your paperwork if you then pass the mental health tests as not being mentally ill, and this just continues and a wrongful removal of your child[ ren] .We should find out under data of protection just how many children then continue to be placed long term somewhere else with little contact to birth parents.
The case files also please note will be very hard to access under data of protection through caffcass & the local authority departments.
I ask this question simply because a consultant took out an EPO as I was exhibiting signs of STRESS . I passed the metal health assessment , well the first 1 , the rest were just fixed for court .
I have evidence of how they set me up in faxes to each other prior to hand over of medical notes or appointments to meet the experts.
The end result of a section 44 leads to no contact through the pressure put upon the parent whilst kept long term for 1 hour in a contact centre long term.
It will not be long before they get you 1 way or the other.

The case notes are well documented emotional harm found , even if you do not concede to the allegation.
Then neglect is thrown in for good measure it always has to be both .

hi there ss aplyed for a no contact order with our son they told judge they would not use it if they had it,his comments were this is a clear example of how the ss are using contact as a power tool.ss have to answer to the corperate board if they are theriting to stop your contact it is worth going to them

not yet - but fully expecting it to be an issue in the future seeing as contact has stopped. Unfortunately it happens in public and private law as it is all about the resident parents feelings whether it be carer or mother and making sure they are happy.

Interestingly lynda - we are only being accused of having the potential to emotionally harm - nothing else.

Well the barrister at the start of the trial said let them go for it ; just try this!
They made sure they got what they wanted in the end , I walked from the contact centre rather than subject my son to the bullying tactics of SW's .I do not regret this however I am sure there will be something to say about human rights to stop a child from seeing a parent/family whilst seriously ill.
Let's face it , it was not like I done anything to him in terms of sabotage his treatment for leukaemia in hospital.
I may have blocked the randomisation for the doctor concerned.
That is a good enough reason to take out an EPO .

WE LOST OUR CHIKDREN TO LIES BY S S AND THE COURT SAID WE SHOULD HAVE CONCAT WITH WAS GIVEN BUT FROM THE DAY LAST CASE,,,TRAIL WE NOT SEEN OUR KIDS NOR SPOKEN TO THEM THEY WONT LET US AT ALLLL WOULDRS WHAT WE CAN DO DORM