Welcome
Information to be remembered when discussing your case: Click Here

Welcome to Justice For Families. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Hello Newcomers.

Postby anon on Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:08 pm

The Clayton Vs Clayton law changed that in 2006 so that identities of the child even could be revealed after the case had finished.

However you dont read of any cases , do you? Apart from Simon Claytons thats the first and last I ever heard of.......forgive me if Ive missed hundreds.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... ather.html

That case was a divorce case, as if they are going to let us , social services fodder tell the country what a bunch of lousy, lying, lowdown, no good sheisters some of these court so called professionals can be.

Anytime I have ever written anything on the internet it is always with the thought that THEY are watching me. Local authorities got loads of applications granted to snoop on people last year do you remember at that point on I definatly knew everyting was being watched. Phones are clearly being tapped often.
anon
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:27 am

Postby dmg on Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:11 pm

anon i dont think youve missed any because ive never seen anymore myself but you will be able to read all about me and my daughter when i do get hold of her so keep watching out for our story and the fall-out from it wont you because we will be exposing it :wink: :)
dmg
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: staffordshire

Previous

Return to General Chit Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests